Surgery isn't your only option for back pain.

What you were probably told — and what the research actually says

If you've been told surgery is the next step for your disc herniation, sciatica, or chronic low back pain, you likely left that conversation feeling like you had almost no say in what happens next. That's a hard place to be. It's also, in most cases, a conversation that left out some important information.

The largest study ever done on surgical outcomes for lumbar disc herniation — the SPORT trial, published in JAMA in 2006 — followed over 1,200 patients across multiple surgical centers and found that at two years, outcomes for patients who had surgery were not significantly different from those who received non-operative care. Both groups improved. The people who did best in either group shared one thing: they stayed active and engaged with their rehab. The surgery itself was not the determining variable.

The Cleveland Clinic's patient guide on herniated discs confirms the same: most non-emergency herniations respond well to conservative care. Surgery is typically reserved for cases involving progressive neurological loss — true weakness that worsens, or loss of bladder or bowel control. Outside of those emergency presentations, it is the exception, not the rule.

Surgery also carries risks that don't go away: infection, hardware failure, and adjacent-segment breakdown — where the vertebrae next to a fused level start to degenerate under the new load. A fusion solves a structural problem without changing the mechanical pattern that created it. The movement problem remains. That's why post-surgical chronic pain is one of the most common presentations we see.

Why some discs fail and others don't

Here's something most people aren't told: not everyone gets a disc herniation. If aging alone caused them, every 50-year-old would have one. They don't. So the real question isn't "why do discs break down?" — it's "why did yours break down, in that specific spot, doing the things you specifically do?"

At Move Better, we see disc herniations and chronic back pain as a movement story. The disc didn't fail because your tissue is fragile. It failed because it was repeatedly asked to absorb forces it was never designed to handle — usually for years. That repetitive loading is what creates the irritation, and eventually the injury.

The underlying mechanism is almost always the same: the body is stabilizing the spine by compressing passive tissue — the discs, joints, and ligaments — instead of using the deep muscular system the way it was designed to. Do that thousands of times across a lifetime, and stress accumulates faster than the tissue can recover. A disc bulge on an MRI is not the cause of your pain. It's the record of how your body has been loaded for years.

This is also why imaging often doesn't tell the full story. Studies have found significant disc herniations and degenerative changes in people with no pain whatsoever. The finding on the scan is real — but the scan doesn't tell you why it's there, or whether it's the actual pain generator. That's a movement question, not an imaging question. We go into this in depth in our piece on a better way to diagnose chronic pain .

What we look for instead

The first thing we do is watch you move. Something as simple as sitting down in a chair reveals the two patterns almost immediately in patients with disc and back pain.

How you stabilize your midline. Most people with low back pain let the lumbar spine flex or extend the moment they start to sit. That tells us they're loading passive tissue instead of using the deep core musculature to stabilize. The alternative — pressurizing through the trunk with the diaphragm — is hardwired from infancy. It's not something your body forgot how to do. It's a pattern that got overridden by years of habit, and it can be retrained.

Where motion starts in your lower body. Almost universally, patients with disc pain initiate movement from the knees instead of the hips. The hips have massive muscles built for load — glutes, hamstrings, adductors. The low back doesn't. When you bypass the hips, the spine is forced to do a job it was never designed to do. One cue that changes everything for our patients: push the floor away with your feet. That single refocus pulls the low back out of the danger zone immediately.

We use the Movement Paradigm — our in-house evaluation system — to map exactly where these breakdowns are. It's not guessing. The logic-based scoring tells us which patterns are driving the load and in what order to address them.

What treatment actually looks like

We typically work in three phases for disc and back pain.

Phase one (first 4–6 weeks): Significantly decrease pain, significantly increase function. We teach how to create stability through the midline — starting with diaphragm mechanics and intra-abdominal pressure on your back, then transferring those patterns to sitting, standing, and walking. We retrain the hip hinge so the hips, not the spine, absorb load.

Phase two: Slowly increase physical capacity so the disc has time to heal. Disc tissue heals slower than muscle, and we respect that timeline. The goal is progressive loading in patterns that don't recreate the problem.

Phase three: Real strength training so the new patterns get cemented under load. This is where lasting change happens — where the body defaults to good mechanics even when you're tired, distracted, or lifting your kid out of a car seat. Strength is medicine, and we use it deliberately.

You'll feel meaningful change in the first few weeks. You won't be coming in three days a week forever. We give you a plan with an end in sight — a six-visit care model with a re-exam — because that's what real care looks like.

What about sciatica?

Sciatica — pain, numbness, or tingling that radiates down one leg — is one of the most frightening presentations because it can feel neurological. It often is. But the source is usually mechanical: a disc or joint irritating a nerve root, most often because the spine has been chronically overloaded in a pattern that created that irritation.

The same movement-based approach applies. Once we change the loading pattern, the nerve irritation typically settles. Most of our patients who came in for a surgical consult for sciatica find meaningful improvement within six weeks of treatment. Genuine neurological emergencies — progressive weakness, loss of bladder or bowel function — require immediate surgical evaluation and we will tell you that clearly. But that's a small fraction of sciatica presentations.

What about post-surgical pain?

Surgery changes the anatomy but doesn't retrain the movement pattern that stressed it. That's why post-surgical chronic pain is one of the most common presentations we see — and some of the most impactful work we do. If you've had a discectomy, fusion, or laminectomy and are still in pain, there is almost always a movement story underneath it. The original surgery may have been appropriate. The recovery from it rarely addressed what caused the problem in the first place.

You don't have to have made the "wrong" decision about surgery to benefit from what we do. We meet patients where they are — with or without a surgical history — and work on what we can actually change.

The honest conversation your surgeon may not have had

We refer patients to surgeons when surgery is the right call. We have a clear list of presentations that warrant it, and we don't hedge when we see them. But we also believe that most people who are told they "need" surgery haven't been given a complete picture of the alternatives — or of what the research shows about outcomes.

If you've been told surgery is next, the two-hour first visit at Move Better is a second opinion built around movement, not fear. By the end of it, you'll know whether there's a non-surgical path forward for your specific case — or whether we think you genuinely need the referral. Either way, you'll have an honest answer.

← All notes